Here’s a breakdown of the Hoka Women’s Bondi 9 — its specs, features, performance, pros & cons — and what to watch out for. If you want help finding a good deal (especially in Cameroon / Africa), I can help with that too.

What is the Hoka Bondi 9 (Women)

The Bondi line is Hoka’s “maximum-cushion everyday trainer / road runner / walking shoe,” and the 9 is the latest iteration. It’s designed for plush comfort, smooth transitions, and durability over many miles.

Key Specs & Features

Feature	Specification / Description
Weight (women’s)	~ 9.3 oz (≈ 263 g)
Heel-to-Toe Drop	5 mm (claimed)
Stack Height	Women’s: approx 42 mm heel / 37 mm forefoot (according to some sources)
Upper	Engineered knit mesh with zonal ventilation, ~ 55% recycled polyester
Cushion / Midsole	Uses a “super critical” EVA foam (upgraded) for softness + responsiveness
Stability / Support	Neutral / “inherent stability” via wide base + Active Foot Frame in rearfoot + “J-Frame” in design to limit excessive inward roll (overpronation) without overcorrecting
Outsole / Durability	Durabrasion rubber on high wear zones, good rubber coverage, with strategic cutouts to reduce weight
Fit / Comfort Features	3D molded collar, knit upper, reflective details, extended heel tab

Performance & Review Highlights

Here’s what reviewers and tests tend to say (strengths, weaknesses, and nuances):

Strengths / What People Like

Very plush, comfortable ride for long runs or walking days. It’s built more for comfort than for racing.
Upgraded foam makes it more responsive than some older versions (Bondi 8 was criticized as feeling sluggish)
Stable underfoot — wide base + sidewalls help with lateral control. Good for neutral runners who like a stable feel.
Durable in high-wear rubber zones; outsole holds up well in tests. Available in multiple widths (Regular, Wide, X-Wide) for women.

Weaknesses / Critiques & Things to Watch

It’s relatively heavy for a road running shoe, especially at longer paces.
Some reviewers found the toe box too narrow, especially for those with wide front of foot.
Breathability is decent but not exceptional; the knit is structured, so airflow is moderate.
There is some discrepancy in measured versus claimed drop / stack height in independent “cut in half” tests. For example, one test found a drop closer to ~9 mm (versus 5 mm claimed).
The tongue is not fully gusseted (i.e. not anchored on the sides), which may allow it to shift slightly.